Go Search!

 

October 2002

Grief: Our Most Prevalent Condition


The sudden and hideous advent of terrorism within our borders brings home with clarity – and for some people for the first time – the importance of understanding grief. Always a subject ripe for scholarly investigation, it’s not just academic anymore.

The Center, under a grant from the Project on Death in America of the Open Society Institute, has been focusing for some time on grief as the quintessential mind-body issue.

We have assembled a panel of 28 leading researchers on the subject to ask: What do we know about the natural process of grieving? When does it become pathological? What do we know about treating it?

Just as in medicine, the first rule of grief counseling must be “do no harm.” Second, researchers must learn how individual grieving over the loss of a loved one – a dying parent, a child killed in a car crash, a friend taken too young by cancer – differs from mass grief over terrorist actions.

It is obvious that grief is a most prevalent condition. Almost all of us experience it at some point and most make our way through it with support from friends, family, religion and community. But some people are incapacitated by grief and cannot function healthily in society without professional help.

Although the science has advanced in the past 20 years, there are big gaps in our understanding of what happens when people grieve – how the psychological and emotional experiences associated with bereavement in some people turn into health problems, including compromised immune function and other physical ailments. Grief takes a tremendous toll on individuals, businesses and health care resources. But much of this may not be avoidable, and we should not be looking for some quick pharmaceutical or medical fix that will erase the residual effects of loss.

It is likely that most people go through the grieving processes that do not require medical intervention. In looking at the science of grief, however, we hope to get a better understanding about what the signs and signals are of grief that can and should be supported medically.

Our country has suffered a great loss. It is right and just that we are grieving. These events reminds us that our aim is not to eliminate grief – one of the most basic human emotions. Rather, it is to focus efforts to find appropriate and effective roles for health care services in responding to it.

 
 
 
 

Essays on Good Behavior
2008

Decontructing the Kennedy Coverage - June 2008
Stuck Reading the Small Print - May 2008
Let Them Eat Cupcakes? - April 2008
My 81-Year Old Mom: Drug Safety Expert? - March 2008
A Paradox of Progress - February 2008
“Trust but Verify.” Verify? - January 2008
2007

Better Computer Use Could Enhance Health - December 2007
Expand Care to Treat Broad Patient Needs - November 2007
Science Message Muddled, Public Befuddled - October 2007
Health Reform May Require Outside Instigators - September 2007
Research in the Medical Marketplace - August 2007
No Free Lunch for Health Care Reform - July. 2007
So Many Choices, So Little Information! - June 2007
Improving Health, Climate Similarly Daunting Challenges - May 2007
Lessons and Cautions - April 2007
The Price of Patient Passivity - March 2007
Lipstick-On-A-Pig Health Reform- February 2007
Power,Politics and Performance - January 2007
2006

Quantifying People Particles- Dec. 2006
Great Expectations - Nov. 2006
November Solutions - Oct. 2006
Consequences of Terror Fatigue - Sept. 2006
Carrots and Two-by-Fours- August 2006
The Simple Life - July 2006
Visions of Riskless Solutions - June 2006
The Cure Is First, Then the Disease - May 2006
Give Me Ambiguity, or Something Else - April 2006
A New Vision of Aging - March 2006
Pedestrian Solution to Health Care - Feb. 2006
Daunting in the Dark - Jan. 2006
2005

Reframing the Suboptimal - Dec. 2005
Coming Home to Roost - Nov. 2005
No Killer Apps in Health Information - Oct. 2005
Homeland Security and Public Health - Sep. 2005
They Only Play One on TV - Aug. 2005
Suzy Spotless Takes on Obesity - July 2005
Obligations of Science and Society - June 2005
Caveat Viewer - May 2005
Putting Yourself First - April 2005
Risking the Social Contract - March 2005
Intelligence Quest - Feb. 2005
Political Science - Jan. 2005
2004

Renewing Old Values - Dec. 2004
Home Depot Health Care - Nov. 2004
Radicchio and Responsibility - Oct. 2004
What We Know and When We Know It - Sept. 2004
Evidence-Based Medicare: A Start- Aug. 2004
Leave No Scientist Behind - July 2004
FDA Gives Plan B an F - June 2004
Is Our People Healthy - May 2004
A Full Partnerhsip for the Future - April 2004
Demography Is Destiny - March 2004
Feeling Safe or Being Safe? - Feb. 2004
Prevention Deficit Disorder - Jan. 2004
2003

New Roles, New Spirits - Dec. 2003
La Dolce Vita - Nov. 2003
Pointing Fingers in the Dark - Oct. 2003
Keeping Fit for a Lifetime - Sept. 2003
You Get What They Pay For - Aug 2003
Good At-Bats - July 2003
Undermining Science - June 2003
SARS and the Free Market - May 2003
A Bold Commitment - April 2003
Odds and Ends - Mar. 2003
Neglected Questions - Feb. 2003
Ship Happens - Jan. 2003
2002

Inconvenient Information - Dec. 2002
Capturing the Value of Health Research - Nov. 2002
Whose Science is it, anway? - Oct. 2002
Grief: Our most prevalent condition - Oct. 2002
A Tale of Two Cities - Sept. 2002
The Opportunity of Cost of Time - Aug. 2002
Balancing the Research Portfolio - Jul. 2002
Point, Click, Heal - Jun. 2002
From Lab to Living Room - May 2002

The Zigzag Path to Truth - Apr. 2002

If it Weren't for the honor - Mar. 2002
No Magic Arrow - Feb. 2002
Media and Messages - Jan. 2002
2001

Persistant Prompting - Dec. 2001
The Winds of Spore - Nov. 2001
Eating Your Heart Out - Sept. 2001
A New Way to Purchase Health - Aug. 2001
These essays appeared in the Center's
newsletter and may be quoted with attribution.

All Essays written by:
Jessie C. Gruman, Ph.D.
President
Center for the Advancement of Health