Through blogs and comments, patients and experts explore what it takes to find good health care and make the most of it.

The Inconvenient Evidence on Alzheimer's

|

Lifestyle May Not Prevent Alzheimer's trumpets a headline in Time magazine.  The article goes on to describe a carefully conducted review of decades of evidence examining the hypothesis that exercise, social relationships, diet or vitamins can ward off Alzheimer's disease. The study concludes that there is not sufficient evidence to be able to recommend that the public take any of these actions to prevent or delay the disease.

Nevertheless, Time reports, the Alzheimer's Association, for its part, will continue advising its members and interested patients to eat a healthy diet and engage in socially and physically rewarding activities. There are hints in the data that offer hope that by changing lifestyle factors and other things, we can in fact perhaps reduce the risk of dementia in the future, says Dr. Maria Carrillo, senior director of medical and scientific relations at the Alzheimer's Association. We feel that we are on the right track.

On one hand, who would ever discourage a respected national organization from promoting the benefits of a good balanced diet, close friends and a brisk walk around the block?

On the other hand, the Alzheimer's Association's casual dismissal of pesky new evidence that calls into question its promise that by behaving better, one can ward off this frightening disease feeds the public's growing belief that evidence is just another piece of information that can be used or ignored depending on whether it furthers a self-serving commercial or political agenda.

We are already suspicious of the use of evidence as a determining factor in the health care we receive.  Many of us don't understand evidence-based care and are concerned that evidence-based guidelines are being used by insurance companies and the government to limit the drugs and services that might ease our suffering.

The Alzheimer's Association's open and cynical disregard of inconvenient evidence confirms these fears. Such actions on the part of a leading patient advocacy group delivers one more sucker punch to the public's confidence in the research enterprise confidence that is needed for the heavy lift ahead the national investment in conducting comparative effectiveness research and translating it into more effective health care.

More Blog Posts by Jessie Gruman

author bio

Jessie C. Gruman, PhD, was founder and president of the Center for Advancing Health from 1992 until her death in July 2014. Her experiences as a patient — having been diagnosed with five life-threatening illnesses — informed her perspective as an author, advocate and lead contributor to the Prepared Patient Blog. Her book, AfterShock, helps patients and caregivers navigate their way through the health care system following a serious or life-threatening diagnosis. The free app, AfterShock: Facing a Serious Diagnosis, offers a pocket guide based on the book. | More about Jessie Gruman


Tags for this article:
Alzheimers Disease/Dementia   Jessie Gruman   Promote your Health   Get Preventive Health Care   Aging Well  


Comments on this post
Please note: CFAH reserves the right to moderate all comments posted to the Prepared Patient® Blog. Any inappropriate postings will be removed.


No comments have been entered yet.