|
Facts
of Life
Facts of Life:
Issue Briefing for Health Reporters
Vol. 12, No. 3
March 2007
Community
Health Workers: Homegrown Care
The Issue
The Facts
Training Community Health Workers
Expert Sources
References
The
Issue:
Community
health workers deliver health information, support and other service
to neighborhoods where traditional health care falls short. Also called
lay health workers, promotores and promotoras are usually volunteers
who live in the communities they serve. 1 In the United States, most
lay helpers work exclusively in areas challenged by ethnic and economic
health disparities and poor access to care. But internationally community
health workers have been an integral part of the wider health system
for nearly a century.
Outreach
and Rapport
The rapport between
promotoras and their neighbors may be the greatest strength of community
health worker programs. Now, that success has attracted the attention
of medical professionals who want to expand the benefits beyond the
neighborhood. Traditionally promotoras have had no formal ties to the
medical system, but now some well-established programs in the Southwest
receive funding from national health maintenance organizations. 2 Researchers
have noted an emerging tension between community health workers who
want to remain tightly focused on their own communities and the larger-scale
ambitions of their supporting institutions.
Expanding
Services
Researchers want
to know if these growing programs can expand beyond underserved communities.
Susan Swider, Ph.D., a registered nurse with Rush University Medical
Center in Chicago, says the workers’ future depends on their
effectiveness: “For chronic illnesses and behavior change, if
they can take the time and have something in common with their listeners,
community health workers may have broader applicability.”
The
Facts:
· A
2002 research review found that community health worker programs were
most effective at increasing
access to care,
especially in underserved populations. 3
· A 2004
systematic review found that community health workers could improve
access to health services among ethnic
minority women. 4
· A 2006 systematic review of the effectiveness of community
health workers for people with diabetes found that the care could improve
patients’ knowledge of the disease. 5
· A national
survey found that state certification of community health worker programs
made it easier to obtain Medicaid
reimbursement
for these services. 6
· An analysis
of a Denver-area community health worker program serving almost 600
men found that the program saved
nearly $96,000 annually
in uncompensated public health costs. 7
· Community
health workers helped older Latina women eat more fruits and vegetables
daily than their counterparts
who did not see a
community health worker, according to a 2004 preventive health study. 8
· A program
that included church-based education and community health worker outreach
did not significantly increase
breast cancer screening
rates among Colorado Latinas with Medicaid. 9
· Latino
farm workers were more likely to use protective eyewear when community
health workers trained them in its
use, according to a
2004 study. 10
· A four-year
community health worker program to improve blood pressure monitoring
in a Baltimore neighborhood significantly
increased
the percentage of participants with controlled blood pressure. 11
· A Baltimore
community health worker program serving African-Americans with diabetes
helped reduce emergency room
visits by 40 percent and Medicaid
reimbursements by 27 percent among the patients. 12
· A small
Canadian study of community health workers trained to reduce falls
among their older clients found that
the intervention
reduced the number of falls by 43 percent in six months. 13
· Frequent
home visits from a community health worker helped reduce the number
of days that low-income children suffered
asthma symptoms
or needed asthma-related urgent care. 14
Training
Community Health Workers
There
are no national standards for training community health workers and
only a handful of states have pursued formal standards. For decades,
community health workers have been locally recruited and trained. But
some program supporters think it may be time for more formal training
and certification.
Right now, “training
is very specific to a neighborhood and a program and is very inexpensive,
but they [the workers] have nothing to take in their hand to say, ‘we
have this training,’” says Susan Swider, Ph.D., a registered
nurse with Rush University Medical Center in Chicago.
Community health
workers deserve — and have been asking for — a certificate
program that “they can use as a stepping stone” to further
their careers in public health, said Swider, who has done extensive
research on the programs. The lack of formal training “leaves
people in this bad position with nothing to validate themselves to
the outside world. It limits their mobility, they have to keep retraining
or re-proving themselves everywhere they go,” she says.
Swider praises community
health workers for their hard work and successes in underserved neighborhoods.
She said there are many “compelling anecdotes about where they’ve
been effective, but it’s actually hard to collect solid data
when training is so unstandardized.”
If a program “is
going to a funder or a federal or state agency to support their work,
they need this data to make their case about continuing these programs,” Swider
adds.
Lisa Staten, Ph.D.,
a professor of anthropology at the University of Arizona, has worked
with several promotora programs in mostly Latino populations and finds
them “incredibly useful” at providing information and encouraging
behavior change in their neighborhoods. She said a move toward more
formal certification might “eliminate the interpersonal touch” of
a community health worker program.
Instead of seeking
out trusted community members, some programs now “recruit people
by advertisement and drive them through very scripted kind of activities,
losing the interpersonal skills and personal level of comfort” that
comes with a homegrown promotora, Staten says.
Swider and Staten
both say that money, especially Medicaid reimbursement for community
health worker services, is a driving force behind training standards.
But any certification program “should be developed with people
who have worked with promotoras and know about the personal traits
that are very important,” Staten says.
Swider agrees, saying
that the strength of community health workers lies in their ability
to communicate easily with the populations they serve: “Health
workers represent communities that have been marginalized and are very
passionate about that. Putting them in white coats and clipboards starts
to put a little social distance in there.”
Community health
workers are “underrecognized assets” that allow neighborhoods “to
utilize strength from within,” Staten says.
Expert
Sources:
Susan Swider, Ph.D., R.N.
Rush University Medical Center
(312) 942-8826
Susan_M_Swider@rush.edu
Lisa Staten, Ph.D.
University of Arizona
520) 626-3667
staten@email.arizona.edu
Mary Beth Love, Ph.D.
University of California, San Francisco
(415) 338-2708
love@sfsu.edu
Peter Muennig, M.D., M.P.H.
Columbia University
(212) 305-7975
petermuennig@yahoo.com
References
1. S.A. Lewin et
al. Lay health workers in primary and community health care. The Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006, Issue 4.
2. M.L. May and R.B.Contreras (2006) Promotor(a)s, the organizations
in which they work, and an emerging paradox: How organizational structure
and scope impact promotor(a)s' work. Health Policy, in press; online
16 October.
3. S.M. Swider (2002) Outcome effectiveness of community health workers:
an integrative literature review. Public Health Nursing, 19, 11-20.
4. J.O. Andrews et al. (2004) Use of community health workers in research
with ethnic minority women. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36, 358-365.
5. S.L. Norris et al. (2006) Effectiveness of community health workers
in the care of persons with diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 23, 544-556.
6. B.A. Kash et al. (2007) Community health worker training and certification
programs in the United States: Findings from a national survey. Health
Policy, 80, 32-42.
7. E.M. Whitley et al. (2006) Measuring return on investment of outreach
by community health workers. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and
Underserved, 17, 6-15.
8. L.K. Staten et
al. (2004) Provider counseling, health education, and community health
workers: the Arizona WISEWOMAN project.
Journal
of Women’s Health, 13, 547-556.
9. A.L. Welsh et al. (2005) The effect of two church-based interventions
on breast cancer screening rates among Medicaid-insured Latinas. Preventing
Chronic Disease, 2, A07.
10. L. Forst et al. (2004) Effectiveness of community health workers
for promoting use of safety eyewear by Latino farm workers. American
Journal of Industrial Medicine, 46, 607-613.
11. D.M. Levine et al. (2003) The effectiveness of a community/academic
health center partnership in decreasing the level of blood pressure in
an urban African-American population. Ethnicity and Disease, 13, 354-361.
12. D.O. Fedder et al. (2003) The effectiveness of a community health
worker outreach program on healthcare utilization of west Baltimore City
Medicaid patients with diabetes, with or without hypertension. Ethnicity
and Disease, 13, 22-27.
13. V.J. Scott et al. (2006) Falls prevention training for community
health workers: strategies and actions for independent living (SAIL).
Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 32, 48-56.
14. J.W. Krieger et al. (2005) The Seattle-King County Healthy Homes
Project: a randomized, controlled trial of a community health worker
intervention to decrease exposure to indoor asthma triggers. American
Journal of Public Health, 95, 652-659.
The
Center for the Advancement of Health is an independent nonprofit organization
that promotes greater recognition of how psychological, social, behavioral,
economic and environmental factors influence health and illness. The
Center advocates the highest quality research and communicates it to
the medical community and the public. The fundamental aim of the Center
is to translate into policy and practice the growing body of evidence
that can lead to the improvement and maintenance of the health of individuals
and the public. The Center was founded by the John D. and Catherine
T. MacArthur Foundation and the Nathan Cummings Foundation, which continue
to provide core funding. Funding for this series was provided by the
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
For Information Contact:
Lisa Esposito
Editor, Health Behavior News Service
Center for the Advancement of Health
2000 Florida Ave., NW, Suite 210
Washington, DC 20009
p. 202.387.2829 / f. 202.387-2857
hbns-editor@cfah.org
http://www.cfah.org
© Copyright 2007,
Center for the Advancement of Health
|