Facts of Life
Facts of Life:
Issue Briefings for Health Reporters
Vol. 9, No. 8
August 2004
Brushing Up on Fluoride’s Role in Dental Health
The Issue
The Facts
Holes in the Evidence
Expert Sources
References
The Issue:
Dental cavities
are one health problem that’s practically a rite of passage in the
United States: Ninety-four percent of American adults who have any natural
teeth have had at least one cavity in their lifetime. [1] At the same time,
cavity control is one of the great public health success stories of the 20th
century. The introduction of fluoride toothpaste, fluoridated community drinking
water and new topical fluoride treatments like gels, foams and sealants have
significantly reduced the prevalence of cavities, especially among children,
in the past 50 years.
The Jury Is In ...
Fluoride’s
contribution to cavity prevention has been confirmed by numerous individual
studies and several systematic evidence reviews, which calculate the exact
decline in decayed, missing or filled teeth under specific fluoride treatments.
These reviews benefit from the fact that many fluoride studies follow the “gold
standard” of randomized controlled treatments or contain large numbers
of participants that can be followed for multiple years.
Despite the long history
of fluoride treatment, questions remain about how well certain types of fluoride
perform in comparison to others, how big of an effect fluoridation has had
on adult cavities and whether fluoride is the best answer for “high-risk” groups
that seem prone to cavities even in communities with fluoridated water.
The Facts:
- Fluoridated drinking
water can increase the proportion of children without cavities as well
as reduce the number of teeth affected by cavities, according to a review
of 214 studies. [2]
- If the natural concentration of fluoride in community
water sources or home wells exceeds 2 parts per million, children under
the age of 8
may have an increased risk of fluoride overdose, known as fluorosis.
[3]
- The combination of a topical fluoride like a fluoride
mouth rinse, varnish or gel with fluoride toothpaste only slightly
boosts cavity protection
compared to use of a fluoride toothpaste alone. [4]
- According to a 2001 report, fluoride mouth rinses
have had only a limited effect on the occurrence of cavities in
schoolchildren, mostly because
they get cavity protection from other sources. [5]
- A review of 70 studies of schoolchildren found
that the effects of fluoride toothpaste on cavity prevention
increased with higher fluoride concentration,
more frequent brushing and supervised brushing. [6]
- A
Swedish systematic review of 54 studies revealed “strong
evidence” that
toothpastes containing 1,500 parts per million of fluoride were
better than toothpastes with 1,000 parts per million fluoride
at preventing cavities
in children’s permanent dentition. [7]
- Fluoride
gels can be an effective way to prevent cavities, according to a
review of 14 studies that compared the gel’s effect to a placebo.
Gels reduced the number of decayed, missing or filled teeth
by 21 percent in these studies. [8]
- In
2004, the United States Preventive Services Task Force concluded there
was not enough evidence to recommend
for or against primary
care
clinicians evaluating preschool children for cavity risk. [9]
- Surveys of primary
care physicians suggest they do not take into account children’s
everyday fluoride exposure before prescribing fluoride supplements like
varnishes or rinses. [10]
- There are few strong studies supporting nonsurgical
methods to discover and treat tooth lesions before they become cavities,
according to reviews
presented at a 2001 NIH consensus conference. [11]
- The
link between sugar consumption and the prevalence of cavities
has become “much weaker” over
the past two decades in countries with moderate to
extensive fluoride exposure, according to a 2001 evidence
review. [12]
Holes
in the Evidence
In little more
than a half-century, toothpaste with fluoride and fluoridated drinking
water have made a significant impact on the
prevalence of dental cavities in the United States. [13] Fluoride’s
effect on cavity prevention is so well established that systematic
reviews of the treatment may seem to underscore the obvious. But these
reviews have also found gaps in what we know about fluoride’s
benefits and risks.
For instance,
most studies of fluoride treatment and cavity prevalence are done
in children and adolescents, rarely adults. In part, the focus
on children stems from the vulnerability of their “baby” teeth,
which have weaker enamel than permanent teeth. Yet adults may adopt
dietary habits or other health behaviors like smoking that pose their
own special cavity risks. Older adults in particular undergo changes
in the mouth that can boost the likelihood of cavities. As people age,
they tend to produce less saliva and make take more medications that
dry out the mouth as a side effect.
“Without the cleansing and shielding effects of saliva flow,
tooth decay and other oral infections become much more common,” says
Gretchen Gibson, D.D.S., M.P.H., of Veterans Affairs North Texas Health
Care System.
Adults aren’t the only neglected group when it comes to fluoride
studies. Despite improved dental care, a minority of children fall
into a high-risk category for cavities, usually due to a combination
of poor diet, improper or irregular toothbrushing or reduced access
to regular dental care. A recent review by German researchers K.G.
Konig and colleagues at Ernst Moritz Ardnt University suggests that “health
promotion programs that are merely educational and do not provide fluoride
do not seem to be effective” among these children. [14] But they
note that there is a dearth of studies on different fluoridation strategies
for high-risk groups.
Most of the fluoride studies analyzed in systematic reviews report
only whether the treatment reduced the prevalence of cavities in a
population. The reviews seldom include information on possible side
effects and adverse effects of fluoride; in many cases the data are
simply not collected. Fluorosis, or mottled tooth enamel caused by
a fluoride overdose, is the most commonly reported side effect. Fluorosis
is usually mentioned only in studies that examine multiple types of
fluoride treatment.
Systematic reviews of fluoride treatment, like all health interventions,
need to be updated continually with new data to maintain their usefulness.
A growing concern for dentists, for instance, is the rising popularity
of bottled water and home water filtration systems, both of which may
lessen American fluoride consumption. [15] Will these new trends result
in more cavities? New fluoride studies should help fill in this emerging
gap in the evidence.
.
Expert
Sources:
Gretchen Gibson, D.D.S., M.P.H.
Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System
(214) 857-1086
Gretchen.Gibson@med.va.gov
William Kohn, D.D.S.
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention
(770) 488-6071
wak8@cdc.gov
Amid Ismail, M.P.H., Dr.P.H.
University of Michigan
(734) 647-4182
ismailai@umich.edu
James Bader, D.D.S., M.P.H.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
(919) 966-5727
jim_bader@unc.edu
References
1. Division of
Oral Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion, CDC (2002) Preventing dental caries. CDC Fact Sheet. Last
accessed 07-08-04 at http://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/factsheets/dental_caries.htm.
2. McDonagh M.S. et al. (2000) Systematic review of water fluoridation.
British Medical Journal, 321, 855-859.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001) Recommendations
for using fluoride to prevent and control dental caries in the United
States. Morbidity and Mortality Recommendations and Reports, 50, 1-42.
4. Marinho V.C.C. et al.
(2004) Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses,
gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride for preventing
dental caries in children and adolescents (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane
Library, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001) Recommendations
for using fluoride to prevent and control dental caries in the United
States. Morbidity and Mortality Recommendations and Reports, 50, 1-42.
6. Marinho V.C.C. et al.
(2004) Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental caries in children
and adolescents (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane
Library, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
7. Twetman S. et al. (2003) Caries-preventive effect of fluoride toothpaste:
a systematic review. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 61, 347-355.
8. Marinho V.C.C. et al.
(2004). Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and
adolescents (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane
Library, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
9. Calonge N. et al. (2004) Prevention of dental caries in preschool
children: recommendations and rationale. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine, 26, 326-329.
10. Bader, J.D. et al. (2004) Physicians' roles in preventing dental
caries in preschool children: a summary of the evidence for the U.S.
Preventive Services Task Force. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine,
26, 315-325.
11. Office of Medical Applications of Research (2001) Diagnosis and
management of dental caries throughout life. OMAR, Bethesda MD.
12. Burt B.A. and S. Pai (2001) Sugar consumption and caries risk:
a systematic review. Journal of Dental Education, 65, 1017-1023.
13. Division of Oral Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention
and Health Promotion, CDC (1999) Achievements in public health, 1900-1999:
Fluoridation of drinking water to prevent dental caries, Morbidity
and Mortality Weekly Report, 48, 933-940.
14.Splieth, C.H. et al. (2004) Caries prevention programs for groups:
Out of fashion or up to date? Clinical Oral Investigations, 8, 6-10.
15. American Dental Association. (1999) Fluoridation
facts. ADA Publications,
Chicago, IL.
The Center for the Advancement
of Health is an independent nonprofit organization that promotes
greater recognition of how psychological, social, behavioral,
economic and
environmental factors influence health and illness. The Center advocates the highest
quality research and communicates it to the medical community and the public. The
fundamental aim of the Center is to translate into policy and practice the growing body of
evidence that can lead to the improvement and maintenance of the health of individuals and
the public. The Center was founded by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
and the Nathan Cummings Foundation, which continue to provide core funding. Funding for
this series was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
For Information Contact:
Kristina Campbell
Editor, Health Behavior News Service
Center for the Advancement of Health
2000 Florida Ave., NW, Suite 210
Washington, DC 20009
p. 202.387.2829 / f. 202.387-2857
press@cfah.org
http://www.cfah.org
© Copyright 2004, Center for the Advancement of Health
PDF Version
|