Go Search!
 
 

Facts of Life

Facts of Life:
Issue Briefings for Health Reporters
Vol. 9, No. 8
August 2004

Brushing Up on Fluoride’s Role in Dental Health

The Issue

The Facts

Holes in the Evidence

Expert Sources

References

The Issue:

Dental cavities are one health problem that’s practically a rite of passage in the United States: Ninety-four percent of American adults who have any natural teeth have had at least one cavity in their lifetime. [1] At the same time, cavity control is one of the great public health success stories of the 20th century. The introduction of fluoride toothpaste, fluoridated community drinking water and new topical fluoride treatments like gels, foams and sealants have significantly reduced the prevalence of cavities, especially among children, in the past 50 years.

The Jury Is In ...

Fluoride’s contribution to cavity prevention has been confirmed by numerous individual studies and several systematic evidence reviews, which calculate the exact decline in decayed, missing or filled teeth under specific fluoride treatments. These reviews benefit from the fact that many fluoride studies follow the “gold standard” of randomized controlled treatments or contain large numbers of participants that can be followed for multiple years.

... But Questions Remain

Despite the long history of fluoride treatment, questions remain about how well certain types of fluoride perform in comparison to others, how big of an effect fluoridation has had on adult cavities and whether fluoride is the best answer for “high-risk” groups that seem prone to cavities even in communities with fluoridated water.

The Facts:
  • Fluoridated drinking water can increase the proportion of children without cavities as well as reduce the number of teeth affected by cavities, according to a review of 214 studies. [2]

  • If the natural concentration of fluoride in community water sources or home wells exceeds 2 parts per million, children under the age of 8 may have an increased risk of fluoride overdose, known as fluorosis. [3]

  • The combination of a topical fluoride like a fluoride mouth rinse, varnish or gel with fluoride toothpaste only slightly boosts cavity protection compared to use of a fluoride toothpaste alone. [4]

  • According to a 2001 report, fluoride mouth rinses have had only a limited effect on the occurrence of cavities in schoolchildren, mostly because they get cavity protection from other sources. [5]

  • A review of 70 studies of schoolchildren found that the effects of fluoride toothpaste on cavity prevention increased with higher fluoride concentration, more frequent brushing and supervised brushing. [6]

  • A Swedish systematic review of 54 studies revealed “strong evidence” that toothpastes containing 1,500 parts per million of fluoride were better than toothpastes with 1,000 parts per million fluoride at preventing cavities in children’s permanent dentition. [7]

  • Fluoride gels can be an effective way to prevent cavities, according to a review of 14 studies that compared the gel’s effect to a placebo. Gels reduced the number of decayed, missing or filled teeth by 21 percent in these studies. [8]

  • In 2004, the United States Preventive Services Task Force concluded there was not enough evidence to recommend for or against primary care clinicians evaluating preschool children for cavity risk. [9]

  • Surveys of primary care physicians suggest they do not take into account children’s everyday fluoride exposure before prescribing fluoride supplements like varnishes or rinses. [10]

  • There are few strong studies supporting nonsurgical methods to discover and treat tooth lesions before they become cavities, according to reviews presented at a 2001 NIH consensus conference. [11]

  • The link between sugar consumption and the prevalence of cavities has become “much weaker” over the past two decades in countries with moderate to extensive fluoride exposure, according to a 2001 evidence review. [12]

Holes in the Evidence

In little more than a half-century, toothpaste with fluoride and fluoridated drinking water have made a significant impact on the prevalence of dental cavities in the United States. [13] Fluoride’s effect on cavity prevention is so well established that systematic reviews of the treatment may seem to underscore the obvious. But these reviews have also found gaps in what we know about fluoride’s benefits and risks.

For instance, most studies of fluoride treatment and cavity prevalence are done in children and adolescents, rarely adults. In part, the focus on children stems from the vulnerability of their “baby” teeth, which have weaker enamel than permanent teeth. Yet adults may adopt dietary habits or other health behaviors like smoking that pose their own special cavity risks. Older adults in particular undergo changes in the mouth that can boost the likelihood of cavities. As people age, they tend to produce less saliva and make take more medications that dry out the mouth as a side effect.

“Without the cleansing and shielding effects of saliva flow, tooth decay and other oral infections become much more common,” says Gretchen Gibson, D.D.S., M.P.H., of Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System.

Adults aren’t the only neglected group when it comes to fluoride studies. Despite improved dental care, a minority of children fall into a high-risk category for cavities, usually due to a combination of poor diet, improper or irregular toothbrushing or reduced access to regular dental care. A recent review by German researchers K.G. Konig and colleagues at Ernst Moritz Ardnt University suggests that “health promotion programs that are merely educational and do not provide fluoride do not seem to be effective” among these children. [14] But they note that there is a dearth of studies on different fluoridation strategies for high-risk groups.

Most of the fluoride studies analyzed in systematic reviews report only whether the treatment reduced the prevalence of cavities in a population. The reviews seldom include information on possible side effects and adverse effects of fluoride; in many cases the data are simply not collected. Fluorosis, or mottled tooth enamel caused by a fluoride overdose, is the most commonly reported side effect. Fluorosis is usually mentioned only in studies that examine multiple types of fluoride treatment.

Systematic reviews of fluoride treatment, like all health interventions, need to be updated continually with new data to maintain their usefulness. A growing concern for dentists, for instance, is the rising popularity of bottled water and home water filtration systems, both of which may lessen American fluoride consumption. [15] Will these new trends result in more cavities? New fluoride studies should help fill in this emerging gap in the evidence.

.

Expert Sources:

Gretchen Gibson, D.D.S., M.P.H.
Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System
(214) 857-1086
Gretchen.Gibson@med.va.gov

William Kohn, D.D.S.
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention
(770) 488-6071
wak8@cdc.gov

Amid Ismail, M.P.H., Dr.P.H.
University of Michigan
(734) 647-4182
ismailai@umich.edu

James Bader, D.D.S., M.P.H.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
(919) 966-5727
jim_bader@unc.edu



References

1. Division of Oral Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC (2002) Preventing dental caries. CDC Fact Sheet. Last accessed 07-08-04 at http://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/factsheets/dental_caries.htm.

2. McDonagh M.S. et al. (2000) Systematic review of water fluoridation. British Medical Journal, 321, 855-859.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001) Recommendations for using fluoride to prevent and control dental caries in the United States. Morbidity and Mortality Recommendations and Reports, 50, 1-42.

4. Marinho V.C.C. et al. (2004) Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001) Recommendations for using fluoride to prevent and control dental caries in the United States. Morbidity and Mortality Recommendations and Reports, 50, 1-42.

6. Marinho V.C.C. et al. (2004) Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

7. Twetman S. et al. (2003) Caries-preventive effect of fluoride toothpaste: a systematic review. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 61, 347-355.

8. Marinho V.C.C. et al. (2004). Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

9. Calonge N. et al. (2004) Prevention of dental caries in preschool children: recommendations and rationale. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26, 326-329.

10. Bader, J.D. et al. (2004) Physicians' roles in preventing dental caries in preschool children: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26, 315-325.

11. Office of Medical Applications of Research (2001) Diagnosis and management of dental caries throughout life. OMAR, Bethesda MD.

12. Burt B.A. and S. Pai (2001) Sugar consumption and caries risk: a systematic review. Journal of Dental Education, 65, 1017-1023.

13. Division of Oral Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC (1999) Achievements in public health, 1900-1999: Fluoridation of drinking water to prevent dental caries, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48, 933-940.

14.Splieth, C.H. et al. (2004) Caries prevention programs for groups: Out of fashion or up to date? Clinical Oral Investigations, 8, 6-10.

15. American Dental Association. (1999) Fluoridation facts. ADA Publications, Chicago, IL.



The Center for the Advancement of Health is an independent nonprofit organization that promotes greater recognition of how psychological, social, behavioral, economic and environmental factors influence health and illness. The Center advocates the highest quality research and communicates it to the medical community and the public. The fundamental aim of the Center is to translate into policy and practice the growing body of evidence that can lead to the improvement and maintenance of the health of individuals and the public. The Center was founded by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Nathan Cummings Foundation, which continue to provide core funding. Funding for this series was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

For Information Contact:
Kristina Campbell
Editor, Health Behavior News Service
Center for the Advancement of Health
2000 Florida Ave., NW, Suite 210
Washington, DC 20009
p. 202.387.2829 / f. 202.387-2857
press@cfah.org
http://www.cfah.org

© Copyright 2004, Center for the Advancement of Health

PDF Version