February
2, 2005
|
Vol.
8 No. 2
|
NEW STUDY NAMES TOP HOSPITALS FOR COMMON PROCEDURES
Patients needing a heart bypass or hip replacement would do well to
choose one of the 229 hospitals named in a new report that identifies
the top 5 percent of hospitals in the nation in clinical quality. The
report, released by the health care quality company HealthGrades, Inc.
on Jan. 24, ranks the top hospitals based on the death and complication
rates of Medicare patients undergoing procedures for 28 common conditions,
including heart attack, pancreatitis, stroke, pneumonia, back surgery
and others.
The HealthGrades researchers
collected data on nearly 5,000 hospitals between 2001 and 2003.
In particular, they found that complication
and death rates were “significantly lower” at the top
hospitals after a heart bypass, heart attack, pneumonia or stroke,
compared to the rest of the hospitals in the study. For instance,
a heart bypass patient at one of the top hospitals had a 15 percent
better chance of survival than a patient who received a bypass at
an average hospital.
For many procedures, the chances of survival were 12 percent to
20 percent better in these top five percent hospitals, despite the
fact that they treated more and sicker patients, the HealthGrades
team found.
“Because of the variation in quality from one hospital to
the next, which HealthGrades has been documenting for eight years
now, patients need to do their research before choosing a local hospital,” Samantha
Collier, M.D., HealthGrades' vice president of medical affairs says.
Based on population numbers from the 2000 U.S. Census, the Great
Lakes region has the highest concentration of top hospitals per capita,
while the West Coast has the lowest concentration, according to the
report.
The HealthGrades authors
note that Medicare, Medicaid and most private health insurers do
not offer financial incentives to hospitals with
a record of quality care, a system they say “flies in the face
of market economics in other sectors, including those contracted
by the federal government.”
“A consumer would not pay the same for a Mercedes S-Class
Sedan and a used Ford Focus because the quality difference is obvious,” the
report authors write. “In healthcare, these ‘products’ cost
the same, thereby eliminating the financial rewards for quality providers
and exacerbating the quality improvement problem.”
To download a PDF copy of the complete report, go here.