|
June 24,
2003 JOURNAL ROUNDUP: RACE, REFORM AND GLOBAL DIABETES
Should biomedical
researchers write about race? The consensus seems to be yes, especially
since race and ethnic identification can be important
in documenting health disparities. But researchers should include racial
or ethnic categories only when they are clearly defined and are relevant
to their study, say Judith B. Kaplan, M.S., and Trude Bennett, Dr.P.H.,
in the May 28, 2003, issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
(here; subscription or 24-hour
access purchase required) Among the writing guidelines outlined in the JAMA paper are warnings
not to use racial or ethnic data as a proxy for genetic variation and
to consider the effect of socioeconomic status and similar factors before
comparing racial groups. In the June 13 issue
of Science (here), Floyd
Bloom,
M.D., Ph.D., predicts the “imminent collapse of the
American health system” unless radical change begins soon. Building
off his presidential address at the AAAS annual meeting earlier this
year (see HABIT, Feb. 25, 2003, at http://www.cfah.org/habit/vol6no2/),
Bloom calls for a new federal commission to look at how the health care
system could be overhauled to ensure that biomedical discoveries are
turned into meaningful health advances. Finally, a story
in the June 5 issue of Nature (here;
free access) by evolutionary biologist Jared Diamond, Ph.D., looks at
why Europeans have largely escaped the global epidemic of type 2 diabetes.
Diamond suggests that many populations around the world have a genetic
predisposition to diabetes that has been awakened by the Western “coca-colonization” lifestyle.
These populations were predisposed to diabetes by waves of food shortages
that helped select for calorie-collecting genes, says Diamond, who suggests
that Europeans have not experienced similar shortages in recent history.
|
|
||||||