|
September
23,
2003 NAS STUDY
SUGGESTS MODEST CHANGES TO NIH
In 2001, Congress asked whether
the National Institutes of Health was “optimally
configured for the scientific needs of the 21st century.” In 2003,
the National Academy of Sciences came back with a reply: NIH could use
a makeover, but widespread consolidation of its 27 institutes and centers
might cause more problems than it would solve. Instead, the NAS report offers
some smaller fixes to boost multidisciplinary and innovative research
programs without demolishing NIH’s open
and decentralized structure, crafted through decades of “social
and political negotiations,” according to the report. It suggests
only two mergers, combining the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism with the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and folding the
National Human Genome Research Institute back into the National Institute
of General Medical Sciences. Many of the report’s recommendations focus on developing “trans-NIH
initiatives.” These multi-institute programs, similar to those
suggested by NIH Director Elias Zerhouni’s Roadmap proposal, would
go beyond pooling funds to creating truly multidisciplinary research
projects. To encourage these initiatives, the report also recommends
strengthening the Office of the Director by giving it more control over
its own budget and allowing it more leverage over the individual institutes’ funding. The NAS report also called for the creation of a National Center for
Clinical Research and Research Resources to improve collaboration between
NIH-sponsored clinical research programs. The new center would replace
the National Center for Research Resources and have its own deputy director. Congress has already expressed interest in adopting some of the recommendations
after scientists, advocacy groups and others have had a chance to weigh
in. But as the NAS authors note, similar recommendations in a 1984 Institute
of Medicine study led to few changes. The current report hopes to avoid
that fate by requesting that Congress support an official public process
for reorganizing the Institutes. To read the full report, go to here. |
|
||||||