Electronic Health Records Could Improve Care for Type 2 Diabetics

Release Date: January 24, 2012 | By Christen Brownlee, Contributing Writer
Research Source: Health Services Research

KEY POINTS

  • Switching from paper records to electronic records does not adversely affect the care of patients with type 2 diabetes older than 40, according to a new study in Health Services Research.
  • Patients older than 40 with type 2 diabetes at a clinic that uses electronic records are more likely to meet blood pressure target levels, refrain from smoking and take aspirin daily than patients at clinics that continue to use paper records.
  • Switching to electronic records might not help patients older than 40 with type 2 diabetes to control their cholesterol levels or improve their HbA1c levels.
Follow us on Facebook

Use of electronic health records shows promise for improving care and outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes, but still has considerable room for improvement, according to a new study in the journal Health Services Research.

With the U.S Department of Health and Human Services currently offering incentives for medical practices to move their records to electronic systems—and Medicare payment penalties to those who don’t convert by 2015—doctors and hospitals are increasingly incorporating these tools into their practices. However, the notion that electronic health records can improve care measurably has been under significant debate, said study co-leader Jeph Herrin, Ph.D., of Yale University.

“What’s unknown is whether moving to an electronic health records system would actually improve health outcomes,” he said. “So far, different studies have shown different results.”

Seeking more evidence, Herrin, co-author David Ballard, M.D., Ph.D., and their colleagues took advantage of two concurrent initiatives at the HealthTexas Provider Network, a northern Texas primary care medical group subsidiary of Baylor Health Care System. The first is a long-term effort made by the group to collect health data on their diabetes patients. The second is the roll out, started in 2006, of an electronic health record system to the Network’s nearly 100 clinics.

Herrin and his colleagues followed 14,051 diabetes patients from 34 group clinics over a four-year period. They looked at optimal diabetes care as a whole as well as individually examining each of five measures of diabetes management: HbA1c (a measurement that indicates average blood sugar control over time), LDL cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, aspirin prescription and non-smoking status.

They report that over the rollout period, the 29 practices that had the electronic health record system saw 6,376 diabetic patients. Comparing those exposed to the system to those that were not, the researchers found a significant improvement in all of the variables except for HbA1c and LDL cholesterol in the electronic health records group.

Herrin explained that certain features of the electronic health record system might be responsible for the better health measures among patients whose doctors used it. For example, even if patients visited their physician for something unrelated to diabetes—such as a flu shot—the system reminded their doctor to ask questions related to diabetes care. The researchers also noted that part of the increase might be due to better documentation in electronic health records than in paper records.

“This study offers evidence and reassurance that switching to electronic medical records isn’t going to hurt patients and may in fact help them,” Herrin said.

However, despite the significant increase in the number of patients who met some optimal care and outcome standards, Spyros Mezitis, M.D., an endocrinologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, noted that doctors and electronic health records still have a long way to go.

“This study showed mixed results,” he said. “There’s much room for improvement here.”

Mezitis points out measures for HbA1c and LDL cholesterol, two very important elements in diabetes care, did not improve in this study in the electronic health records group. With the extra initial expense, time and effort it takes to set up electronic health records, he added, more research is needed to develop systems that improve all measures of diabetes care.

TERMS OF USE: This story is protected by copyright. When reproducing any material, including interview excerpts, attribution to the Health Behavior News Service, part of the Center for Advancing Health, is required. While the information provided in this news story is from the latest peer-reviewed research, it is not intended to provide medical advice or treatment recommendations. For medical questions or concerns, please consult a health care provider.

# # #

For More Information:

Reach the Health Behavior News Service, part of the Center for Advancing Health, at hbns-editor@cfah.org or (202) 387-2829.

Health Services Research is the official journal of the Academy Health and is published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. on behalf of the Health Research and Educational Trust. For information, contact Jennifer Shaw, HSR Business Manager at (312) 422-2646 or jshaw@aha.org. HSR is available online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-6773/


Herrin, J. et al. (2012). The effectiveness of implementing an electronic health record on diabetes care and outcomes. Health Services Research, DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01370.x

Tags for this article:
Diabetes   Health Information Technology  



Comments on this article
Please note: CFAH reserves the right to moderate all comments posted to the Health Behavior News Service. Any inappropriate postings will be removed.

Jeremy Engdahl-Johnson says
January 25, 2012 at 1:24 PM

What is the economic burden of diabetes? Proper management and control could save 49,000 lives and $196 million annually. http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=2699



Add Your Comment
Your name
Your Comment
Characters left:
Check the box to verify you are a human commenter.