Electronic Health Record Adoption Uneven Across U.S.

Release Date: June 27, 2013 | By Sharyn Alden, HBNS Contributing Writer
Research Source: Health Services Research

KEY POINTS

  • In 2011, 30 percent of ambulatory health care settings, accounting for 43 percent of outpatient providers, used electronic health records.
  • Providers in large metropolitan areas were less likely to have implemented electronic health records than providers in smaller metro and rural areas.
  • Ambulatory health care sites in areas with higher concentrations of minorities and lower income populations were slightly less likely to have implemented electronic health records.
Follow us on Facebook

A new study in Health Services Research finds wide geographic variation in the adoption of  electronic health records (EHRs) by ambulatory health care sites, ranging from a high of 88 percent to a low of just 8 percent.

At the state level, the EHR adoption rate for ambulatory care sites ranged from a low of 27 percent in New Jersey to a high of 65 percent in Minnesota. Within states, the variance in EHR adoption rates was at least 20 percentage points in nearly all states (46) and was at least 50 percentage points in a third of states (17).California, Illinois, and Missouri had the largest variations in adoption rates, while Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Wyoming had the smallest.

Electronic health records are expected to add to the quality, safety and efficient delivery of health care but despite the passage of the Health Information Technology for Economic Health Act enacted in 2009 as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provided financial incentives for adoption, many health care providers still have not implemented digital records. 

Jennifer King, Ph.D., chief of research and evaluation at the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and lead author of the study, said that in 2011, when the study was conducted, there was a lower EHR adoption rate in underserved areas, including large metropolitan areas with high concentrations of minority and low income populations. But, she notes, “ in small metropolitan and rural areas, on average, there were slightly higher EHR adoption rates.”

To determine whether there was a “digital divide” emerging in traditionally underserved areas, the researchers gathered data from 261,973 ambulatory health care sites with 716,160 providers across 50 states and the District of Columbia. Health care sites studied ranged from small one-physician sites to large multi-physician practices.

They found that in 2011, 43 percent of providers at ambulatory health care centers used an EHR with the ability to prescribe medication electronically. Areas with high concentrations of minority and low income populations and large metropolitan areas were more likely than average to be in the lowest quartile of EHR adoption nationally.

The researchers note that efforts to promote EHR use should be targeted to areas where traditionally underserved populations live in order to avoid exacerbating existing health disparities.

Jocelyn G. DeWitt, Ph.D., chief information officer with University of Wisconsin Health, Madison said, “This study validates that the cost of EHR implementation is still prohibitive in many communities despite efforts by the federal government to provide incentives. Attention needs to be paid to urban areas as much as rural communities for EHR adoption. It is incorrect to assume that urban clinicians have the resources to implement EHR.”

DeWitt noted that since ambulatory care doctors in urban areas are less likely to adopt EHR than those in rural areas, it can be assumed that federal investments in both data infrastructures and EHR for rural regions is having a positive effect. But she added the study underscores the need for incentives for both urban and rural health care practices to implement and use EHR.

TERMS OF USE: This story is protected by copyright. When reproducing any material, including interview excerpts, attribution to the Health Behavior News Service, and part of the Center for Advancing Health, is required. While the information provided in this news story is from the latest peer-reviewed research, it is not intended to provide medical advice or treatment recommendations. For medical questions or concerns, please consult a health care provider.

For More Information:

Reach the Health Behavior News Service, part of the Center for Advancing Health, at (202) 387-2829 or hbns-editor@cfah.org.

Health Services Research is the official journal of the Academy Health and is published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. on behalf of the Health Research and Educational Trust. For information, contact Jennifer Shaw, HSR Business Manager at (312) 422 2646 or jshaw@aha.org. HSR is available online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-6773/

 

Tags for this article:
Health Information Technology   Find Good Health Care   Health Care Quality   Environment and Health   Inside Healthcare   Medical/Hospital Practice  



Comments on this article
Please note: CFAH reserves the right to moderate all comments posted to the Health Behavior News Service. Any inappropriate postings will be removed.

No comments have been entered yet.