Residents provided conflicting accounts of strict home smoking bans in
12 percent of the households surveyed, according to Elizabeth Mumford,
Ph.D., and colleagues at the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation.
The report in the August issue of the American Journal
of Preventive Medicine is the first to measure inconsistencies in how
a household’s residents
describe their home smoking restrictions.
“Home ban rates are lower and knowledge of these rates is less definitive
in homes where bans are arguably most important, where a smoker resides,” Mumford
and colleagues say.
Disagreements about whether and what type of smoking ban
exists in a house are 60 percent more likely in homes with a current
smoker, the researchers
found. Residents in homes with an ex-smoker are nearly 40 percent more
likely to give conflicting reports about their home’s smoking rules.
Residents in racial or ethnic minority households and
households with higher-than-average education or income are also more
likely to disagree
about their home’s smoking restrictions.
The mix of a current or ex-smoker and children in the house also increases
the likelihood that residents will disagree on home smoking policy.
“Homes with a child and a smoker were even more likely to provide
discrepant reports than those with just a smoker,” Mumford and
colleagues say.
The researchers analyzed survey data from 43,613 households in 1998 and
1999 where multiple household members were asked about home smoking restrictions.
Homes where all residents agreed on smoking policy were classified as
having either strict or nonstrict restrictions against smoking in the home.
Nonstrict households were more likely to have at least one current smoker.
