Counseling Has Limited Benefit on Young People Drinking Alcohol

Release Date: August 21, 2014 | By Wiley Science Newsroom
Research Source: The Cochrane Library


  • Motivational interviewing did not substantially reduce drinking or alter alcohol-related behavior in young people.
  • On average participants who had counseling had about 1 and a half fewer drinks per week compared to those who had no counseling.
Follow us on Facebook

[Wiley Science Newsroom Press Release]

Counseling techniques used to help young people with drinking problems may be of limited benefit, a new study suggests. In a systematic review published in The Cochrane Library, researchers found that an approach known as motivational interviewing did not substantially reduce drinking or alter alcohol-related behaviour.

Globally every year, around 320,000 young people between the ages of 15 and 29 die as a result of alcohol misuse. Most of these deaths are due to car accidents, murders, suicides or drowning. Motivational interviewing is a counseling technique developed in the 1980s that is sometimes offered to people with alcohol problems. It aims to help them overcome ambivalence and change behaviour. Counsellors listen, adopt a non-judgemental, non-confrontational stance and provide support to change by highlighting the negative consequences of drinking.

The researchers reviewed evidence from 66 trials involving a total of 17,901 young people aged 25 and under. Many of the studies recruited young people who were at high risk of alcohol related problems. In 49 trials, those involved attended one individual session. In the others, they attended group sessions or a mixture of group and individual sessions. Four months later, participants who underwent counseling had only slightly reduced the amount they drank and how often they drank compared with people who were untreated. On average participants who had counseling had about 1 and a half fewer drinks per week compared to those who had no counseling (12.2 drinks compared with 13.7). The effect of counseling on the number of drinking days was also very small: 2.57 days per week compared to 2.74 in untreated people). Participants also slightly reduced their maximum blood alcohol levels from 0.144% to 0.129%, but their average blood alcohol levels did not change. Motivational interviewing had no effect on alcohol-related problems, binge drinking, drunk-driving and other risky behaviours related to alcohol.

“The results suggest that for young people who misuse alcohol there is no substantial, meaningful benefit of motivational interviewing,” said lead researcher David Foxcroft, who is based at the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences at Oxford Brookes University in Oxford, UK. “The effects we saw were probably too small to be of relevance to policy or practice.”

The young people involved in trials included university and college students, army recruits, prisoners and young people attending healthcare centres, youth centres and job centres. “There may be certain groups of young adults for whom motivational interviewing is more successful in preventing alcohol-related problems,” said Foxcroft. “But we need to see larger trials in these groups to be able to make any firm conclusions.”

Cochrane is an independent, trusted producer of research into the effects of healthcare treatments and interventions. Policy makers, healthcare practitioners and patients can make better decisions using accessible, high quality, trusted evidence.

Full citation:Foxcroft DR, Coombes L, Wood S, Allen D, Almeida Santimano NML. Motivational interviewing for alcohol misuse in young adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 8. Art.No.:CD007025. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007025.pub2

URL Upon publication:

Tags for this article:
Alcohol/Drug Abuse   Mental Health   Participate in your Treatment   Promote your Health   Children and Young People's Health   Lifestyle and Prevention  

Comments on this article
Please note: CFAH reserves the right to moderate all comments posted to the Health Behavior News Service. Any inappropriate postings will be removed.

H says
August 26, 2014 at 7:55 PM

It states in this meta-analysis "In 49 trials, those involved attended one individual session".I am amazed that it would be expected that any treatment would be effective after 1 session. To me an analogy would be taking 1 antidepressant tablet and expecting it to have an effect 4 months later! It would be interesting to know if motivational interviewing is effective if participants have more than one session?